CHRIS09 wrote:Um, and for those of you who rationalize ear cropping by saying its the same as circumcision....there's one major difference: Humans don't go walking around with their penises constantly on display.
Ear Cropping/Tail Docking Position Statement
Ear cropping and/or tail docking in pets for cosmetic reasons are not medically indicated nor of benefit to the patient. These procedures cause pain and distress, and, as with all surgical procedures, are accompanied by inherent risks of anesthetic complications, hemorrhage, and infection. Therefore, the American Animal Hospital Association opposes both the cropping of ears and the docking of tails when done solely for cosmetic reasons. Veterinarians should counsel and educate pet owners that these procedures should not be performed unless medically necessary. The American Animal Hospital Association also encourages the elimination of ear cropping and tail docking from breed standards.
CHRIS09 wrote:Yeah I suppose there is the sanitary aspect to circumcision. But parents don't have their kids circumcised to make them look cooler and win beauty pageants.
AllAmericanPUP wrote:many people have asked me what breed Eli is and then when I say pit bull terrier they say "oh i couldnt tell without the cropped ears"
mydogroxy wrote:as for the whole pit bull image thing. i think a well behaved dog with proper temperment is far more impressive than one who has natural ears. part of the education process is teaching people that just because a dog looks powerful, intimidating, etc. doesn't mean it's aggressive. not cropping a dog because he'll look less threatening really isn't that important.
Users browsing this forum: tiva and 4 guests