El_EmDubya wrote:PS Prednisone is known to cause pancreatitis, along with antibiotics. Unfortunately a lot of these "modern" medicines work against the third law of physics which states that for every action there is an equal and opposite action. Every medication creates motion and the "equal and opposite" motions are the side effects. Sometimes we don't see those side effects until well after the initial motion, sadly.
El_EmDubya wrote:Google is your friend:
Acute pancreatitis in two dogs given azathioprine and prednisone.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3679957
El_EmDubya wrote:
And, dogs and humans shared similar diets up until 1900s...which, yes, both were ~70% fat.
El_EmDubya wrote:Caloric content...duh, not volume.
Misskiwi67 wrote:Seriously?? In what world is this good advice for ANY species? In what part of nature does this EVER occur (outside possibly arctic mammals?)??
El_EmDubya wrote:Caloric content...duh, not volume.
El_EmDubya wrote:Ms. K, Since this entire conversation has been about caloric content, as mentioned in the initial posts, and, in medical nutritional consults, the distribution of caloric percentage between Fat/Protein/Carbs is very standard, I would have expected you, as a medical professional, to know.
So, I guess the issue is that you can dish it out:Misskiwi67 wrote:Seriously?? In what world is this good advice for ANY species? In what part of nature does this EVER occur (outside possibly arctic mammals?)??
El_EmDubya wrote:Ms. K, Since this entire conversation has been about caloric content, as mentioned in the initial posts, and, in medical nutritional consults, the distribution of caloric percentage between Fat/Protein/Carbs is very standard, I would have expected you, as a medical professional, to know.
So, I guess the issue is that you can dish it out:Misskiwi67 wrote:Seriously?? In what world is this good advice for ANY species? In what part of nature does this EVER occur (outside possibly arctic mammals?)??
But you can't take it?El_EmDubya wrote:"Caloric content...duh, not volume.
It's clear from the anthropological literature that hunter-gatherers did not go after representative animals. They went after the fattest animals they could find. They knew exactly which animals were fattest in which seasons, which individuals were likely to be fattest within a herd, and which bodyparts were fattest on an individual animal. For example, Stefansson describes how the Inuit relied on (extremely fat) seal in the spring, wolf in the summer, and caribou and bear in the fall and early winter. If necessary, they would discard lean meat in favor of tongue, marrow, internal organs, back fat and other fat-rich bodyparts. This was in order to obtain a minimum of 65% of calories from fat.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest